Whenever we make any argument we name it as thinking. The method of thinking was designed by Socrates, Plato and Aristu. Argument is an excellent method of thinking which is well served to us. When we talk about motivation, in argument the motivation may be high because it is in aggressive motivation.
If we take the example of a lawyer in a court of law will not mention points which help the defense case. We use argument not because it is wonderful method but we do not know any other method. After a long period of time most of the philosophers came with different concept of thinking named “parallel thinking”.
This method used widely in family discussion because it allows everyone to put forward their thinking. It is quite different to the ego-driven method of argument because in this method you allow everyone to take a part in discussion. Other form of argument which was named ‘battle-oriented’ treats the argument like battle cause of furious and aggressive points. In short parallel thinking is nothing but an open conversation among people to find out most promising solution of the problem. Other benefit of this type of thinking is satisfaction of the people with the solution itself. For the method of work it is essential that at any moment everyone is looking ‘in parallel’ in the same directions. So let’s start with this new concept of thinking……
according to me argument is just to prove urself...
ReplyDeletewe frame our thoughts to just prove ourselves with the help of argument but its not like that....
ReplyDeletewe can explore the subject with this......
i am agree with parallel thinking
Right jessica arguments is just to prove urself.
ReplyDeleteso true discussion is must, it helps in exchanging the thinking of different peoples....
ReplyDeleteits a good way to explore the subject
ReplyDelete